In a judgement on 25th November 2016 (file no.: V CSK 123/16) the Supreme Court decided that a landlord may not impose on a tenant a contractual penalty amounting to 210 pct of the monthly rent, because such a fine is excessive and therefore in breach of Article 484 § 2 of the Civil Code.
The ruling was made on a case regarding the termination of a lease agreement of a restaurant premises. The parties decided that in the event of the failure of the tenant to return the premises after the termination of the lease agreement, the landlord would have the right to request the tenant pay a contractual penalty of 7 pct of the monthly rent for each day that the premises was not returned (which on a monthly basis amounts to 210 pct of the rent). After the tenant failed to pay the rent for an extended period of time, the landlord decided to terminate the contract. The tenant, however, failed to return the premises so the landlord demanded the tenant pay the contractual penalty.
The above
The quiet revolution in Małopolska
The quiet revolution in Małopolska
Developers across the region are increasingly favouring heat pumps and photovoltaic systems over traditional gas boilers in warehouse construction. This shift marks a growing commi ...
Axi Immo
Modular construction becomes more prominent
Modular construction becomes more prominent
After a temporary slowdown, the modular construction market in Poland continues to expand in 2025. Although the sector faces challenges such as high material costs and investment f ...
Spectis
EXPO REAL 2025: From survival mode to selective recovery
EXPO REAL 2025: From survival mode to selective recovery
This year’s EXPO REAL in Munich marked a noticeable shift in tone across industry conversations. Following a period of uncertainty and postponed investment decisions, the com ...
Axi Immo