In a judgement on 25th November 2016 (file no.: V CSK 123/16) the Supreme Court decided that a landlord may not impose on a tenant a contractual penalty amounting to 210 pct of the monthly rent, because such a fine is excessive and therefore in breach of Article 484 § 2 of the Civil Code.
The ruling was made on a case regarding the termination of a lease agreement of a restaurant premises. The parties decided that in the event of the failure of the tenant to return the premises after the termination of the lease agreement, the landlord would have the right to request the tenant pay a contractual penalty of 7 pct of the monthly rent for each day that the premises was not returned (which on a monthly basis amounts to 210 pct of the rent). After the tenant failed to pay the rent for an extended period of time, the landlord decided to terminate the contract. The tenant, however, failed to return the premises so the landlord demanded the tenant pay the contractual penalty.
The above
EXPO REAL 2025: From survival mode to selective recovery
EXPO REAL 2025: From survival mode to selective recovery
This year’s EXPO REAL in Munich marked a noticeable shift in tone across industry conversations. Following a period of uncertainty and postponed investment decisions, the com ...
Axi Immo
Are lease agreements in retail parks still triple-net?
Are lease agreements in retail parks still triple-net?
The lease agreements concluded for retail parks increasingly feature solutions that differ from the classic Triple Net Lease agreements, particularly as regards the settlement of o ...
CMS
Flex market picks up momentum
Flex market picks up momentum
The flexible office market in Poland is growing rapidly. In the upcoming years, we can expect the pace of its development to accelerate. Currently, over 420,000 sqm of flex space a ...
Walter Herz