In a judgement on 25th November 2016 (file no.: V CSK 123/16) the Supreme Court decided that a landlord may not impose on a tenant a contractual penalty amounting to 210 pct of the monthly rent, because such a fine is excessive and therefore in breach of Article 484 § 2 of the Civil Code.
The ruling was made on a case regarding the termination of a lease agreement of a restaurant premises. The parties decided that in the event of the failure of the tenant to return the premises after the termination of the lease agreement, the landlord would have the right to request the tenant pay a contractual penalty of 7 pct of the monthly rent for each day that the premises was not returned (which on a monthly basis amounts to 210 pct of the rent). After the tenant failed to pay the rent for an extended period of time, the landlord decided to terminate the contract. The tenant, however, failed to return the premises so the landlord demanded the tenant pay the contractual penalty.
The above
Modern offices for modern officials
Modern offices for modern officials
Public sector relocates to modern offices The commercial office real estate sector is experiencing growing leasing demand from state institutions. Class A office buildings, featur ...
Newmark Polska
Minimalism or a wealth of features? How companies view offices?
Minimalism or a wealth of features? How companies view offices?
The office market showcases two polar opposite trends in how companies approach leasing and arranging spaces, which can be described as a wealth of features and minimalism. Two d ...
Walter Herz
Office spaces in logistics centres: an alternative to office buildings?
Office spaces in logistics centres: an alternative to office buildings?
The office market in Warsaw is currently experiencing a period of stability in terms of supply and take-up. Recent data on overall tenant activity indicates that clients in the cap ...
Axi Immo